<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>erkkola.net - Latest Comments in Badly desinged press sites won&amp;#8217;t get you media coverage</title><link>http://blogerkkolanet.disqus.com/</link><description>Blog </description><atom:link href="https://blogerkkolanet.disqus.com/badly_desinged_press_sites_won8217t_get_you_media_coverage/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:47:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Badly desinged press sites won&amp;#8217;t get you media coverage</title><link>http://blog.erkkola.net/2009/01/badly-desinged-press-sites-wont-get-you-media-coverage/#comment-5549143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazing that people don't get this yet. It would seem to be lesson 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lesson 2 could be: apart from corporate sites, journalists are also finding their information from social media sites e.g. Twitter, so good content distribution is important in order to capture this interest :o)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Badly desinged press sites won&amp;#8217;t get you media coverage</title><link>http://blog.erkkola.net/2009/01/badly-desinged-press-sites-wont-get-you-media-coverage/#comment-5479911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, I'd like to add that proper permalinks are still a problem with many corporate sites. You need to be able to "trust" the links in a way that they will be there in the future as well, otherwise there is no point in linking to these websites and thus, no point in giving visibility either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Relatively simple actually :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antti Vilpponen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>